Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
55.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.83 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank109 centimeter / 42.91 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €117.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/320

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 4500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 4500X offers a gear ratio of 5.7:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa BG 4500X
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
