Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
57.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.82 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight640g / 22.58oz
Line retireve per crank120 centimeter / 47.24 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €115.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/430

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa BG 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Daiwa BG 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG 5000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
