Daiwa BG 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
57.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.82 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight640g / 22.58oz
Line retireve per crank120 centimeter / 47.24 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €115.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/430

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 5000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 5000X offers a gear ratio of 5.7:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa BG 5000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
