Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 6500X and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 6500X offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa BG 6500X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
