Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 6500X and Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 6500X offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Daiwa BG 6500X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
