Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 6500X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 545g / 19,22oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa BG 6500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
