Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 6500X and Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 6500X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa BG 6500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
