Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
85.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX edges out Daiwa BG 6500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the weight (215g / 7,58oz). Still, Daiwa BG 6500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa BG 6500X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
