Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 535g / 18,87oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
