Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 545g / 19,22oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
