Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 8000X and Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 8000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
