Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.54 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
