Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX
