Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
89.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €339.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and total score (8.95 out of 10). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT?
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX
