Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
2000x
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R offers a ball bearings of 3, while Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Mitchell 308 PRO?
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX
