Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R

Seafishing

54.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.88 out of 10

Ergonomics5.51 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight625g / 22.05oz

Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €125.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Penn Sargus II Spinning

Spinning

2500x

64.80 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.05 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight284g / 10.02oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.20
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R offers a gear ratio of 4.9:1, while Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Penn Sargus II Spinning?

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles