Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and total score (8.86 out of 10). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
