Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and total score (8.85 out of 10). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX
