Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
