Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
