Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
