Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT

Spinning

45.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.68 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €30.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C

Seafishing

70.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.79 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs

Weight425g / 14.99oz

Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €435.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Conclusion

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?

Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX

A drag score of 6.22 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs) provides solid stopping power for typical inshore or light offshore fishing
Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.