Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
