Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Spheros SW A
Seafishing
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.97 out of 10
Ergonomics5.76 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight445g / 15.7oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX and Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Shimano Spheros SW A?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (4+1), the reel runs smooth under pressure
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
