Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
