Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
