Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
52.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX and Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX stands out for a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Crossfire LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
