Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R
Seafishing
71.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) and the durability (8.54 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 4.9:1 and a ball bearings of 6+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
