Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT , 5000-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10228-500
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €168.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Daiwa 23 LEXA LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables