Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Mitchell MX2 Spinning, 3000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1530819
Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €29.60
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P edges out Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ergonomics of 6.14 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?

There are not much differences between the two comparables