Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €209.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.59 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
- With a fast retrieve 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX
