Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Shimano Catana FE, 2500 HG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, CAT2500HGFE
Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €30.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 HG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P edges out Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ergonomics of 6.13 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Shimano Catana FE?

There are not much differences between the two comparables