Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Shimano Vanford FA, 2500A, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VF2500A
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €184.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500A
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P and Shimano Vanford FA?

There are not much differences between the two comparables