Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.8 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €110.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
