Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.8 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €110.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and the durability (8.53 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
