Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa Freams LT

Spinning

66.50 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.81 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag-

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €112.70
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and the total score (8 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.