Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
66.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.81 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €112.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the weight (215g / 7,58oz). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X
