Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
79.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 5, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
