Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
79.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 5, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
