Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch and a gear ratio of 5.7:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
