Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX edges out Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the ball bearings (5). Still, Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs and a weight of 625g / 22,05oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Scoring 8.21 out of 10 (625g / 22,05oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
