Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
