Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
