Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX and Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX offers a ball bearings of 5, while Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Freams LT and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
