Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa Fuego LT

Spinning

3000d-cx

66.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €77.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.27 out of 10) and the weight (205g / 7,23oz). Still, Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.