Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
