Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Fuego LT

Spinning

3000d-cx

66.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €77.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Talica 25II CAM

Multireels

25ii Camx

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1 / 2.3:1

Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs

Weight950g / 33.51oz

Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm

Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €499.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size25II CAM
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX clearly outshines Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm). While Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.