Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
