Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
69.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Battle III 2000X
