Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
