Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
