Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
